Sunday, July 16, 2006

Germain's Daughters

Several years ago, when I first started working in general practice,I began to notice a certain recurring type of patient. She was usually in her mid twenties, charming, intelligent, articulate and usually attractive. Engaged in some form of non-menial type of work, and earning a reasonable income, she came into my rooms with a sassy type of walk and water bottle in hand. As the consultation would proceeded I would be told of how she had been referred to me by a friend, and of how she had seen so many other doctors, naturopaths, osteopaths and other purveyors of wellness. Her symptoms usually clustered around abdominal cramps, tiredness, anxiety and chest pressure. Further questioning would reveal that she had been diagnosed at various times with chronic fatigue, irritable bowel, toxins in her body, candidiasis etc. Various therapies had been tried and large sums spent. All had failed. Could I help?

As she had been extensively investigated previously, there was usually no need for additional tests or examinations. However upon further questioning a certain pattern began to emerge.
Most of these women were by modern western standards, successful. They had a career, money and real freedom. They did not seem repressed in terms of their identity or sexuality and were independent. They were living the western women’s dream, yet were unhappy. Profoundly unhappy. When questioning them about their unhappiness, a litany of loathing and tears, more sincere than any self penitent would erupt. They were fat, they were unintelligent and they couldn't find a partner. They were ugly.

They were unlovable.

At first I was quite shocked at this complete disconnect between reality and self perception. As a young man, I would not have hesitated at once to try to make an acquaintance with any of these women. Indeed, they usually did not have a problem with meeting men at all. What they did have was a problem of meeting men who would treat them like a person instead of a means of sexual satisfaction. They were lonely and depressed; their symptoms were psychosomatic.

The pattern of their personal lives seemed to be the same. They usually had a string of liaisons more than relationships. The male leaving them after he became sexually bored, lured away by a more attractive mate or when “demands” were placed on the man. These “demands” usually usually took the form of a promise of commitment or exclusivity. It was interesting to observe that the many a woman would delay making “demands” on her partner for as long as possible as she was fearful of loosing her mate. The imperative however was the biological clock, demanding that a stable relationship be entered for the good of the offspring. It was at this point that the relationship broke down. Time to start again: all men are Bastards.

Indeed their inability to “keep” a man was interpreted by themselves as a failure of attraction or, in a psychologically negative sense, proof of their ugliness. As the cycle repeated, the ideation was verified. A course of anti-depressant medication usually improved their symptoms if not their mental state. They were sad, not mad. They were suffering from a reactive depression with the consequential psychosomatic symptoms. Their existential situation was the cause of their problems . With these girls, a bit of sympathy and understanding went a long way. Explaining to them that this was a ‘widespread’ phenomenon usually helped. Loneliness is terrible when every one else is paired up, easier when there are ‘fellow travelers’. They left lonely, but feeling symptomatically better. I had helped in a small way.

The more I pondered the phenomena, the more convinced I was that there was something seriously wrong. According to current statistics approximately twenty five percent of single people will not marry. Most of these people will live alone, most of them probably involuntarily so. There has been a boom in online dating and introduction agencies, a commercial industry to satisfy the need to be loved, but no evidence of more marriages. The epidemic of loneliness and hence depression is gigantic. This inability to form permanent relationships seems to be a modern phenomenon and from my observations, I believe its roots lie in modern social mores.

Prior to the sexual revolution of the Sixties courtship was a quite straightforward process. Friendship was easy, physical intimacy was very strictly regulated. Getting sex was difficult. Virginity was held in esteem, sex outside marriage frowned upon and rape until recent times a capital offence. The social mores dictated that a woman was expected to resist till after marriage. Any woman who was sexually permissive was ostracized and regarded as “loose” or “wanton”;a social inferior, a public disgrace.

Consequentially a man would have to invest both time and effort with a woman before things proceeded to a more intimate level. Having to spend more time meant that it was more likely that a relationship would develop. Sex when it did occur was likely to be an act between lovers rather than strangers. The more a time a man invested in a woman the greater the price of leaving and starting again, this in itself was a definite disincentive to leave. Because sex was hard to get, it was worth more. Sex was the carrot, erotic love the eventual glue.

More importantly this system of beliefs actually empowered a woman in the sense that she was the one who dictated the terms upon which intimacy occurred. A man was expected to be considerate and committed to her before he got anywhere. The fact that he didn’t wander off even though he wasn’t getting any sex made it more likely that he would stay for other reasons. When she was secure in the relationship she could be intimate, she held all the cards.
This is not to say that prior to the sexual revolution all was right in that sphere of human relations. Although equality was proclaimed women were still treated as inferiors.
Opportunities for intellectual or business development were socially limited. Strong social pressure demanded that women be homemakers no matter how suited or unsuited to the task they were. A woman could work until she was a mother and then it was her proper place to be at home. This kept the woman economically dependent no matter how unwise or capricious her partner. Aspirations outside of this model were socially frowned upon.

Prudery was practiced as a virtue. Many an older surgeon could recount tales of female patients who would not present until a breast tumor or uterine cancer was inoperable due to excessive modesty. Death was, quite literally, preferred to sexual shame. Good women did not think about sex. The good woman was also seen as there for the sexual satisfaction of her husband, her relationship with sexual pleasure ambivalent. A dysfunctional Puritanism, which thought sex “dirty” had the unique effect of driving the joy out of chaste marriages and raising the pleasure of illicit liaisons. Like the Volstead Act, its consequences honored its intentions in the breach.

Into this climate of repressed sexuality and warped conception of female identity came the sexual revolution. The groundwork had been laid by Kinsey who suddenly made it respectable to talk about sex. Meanwhile, Freud who told us it was wrong to feel any guilt with regard to our sexual actions gave legitimacy to any sexual practice. As the societal sexual repression lifted, the pendulum swung the other way. Sexual liberation meant to be “modern”, not “reactionary”. Copulo ergo sum.

Spotting the double standard with regard to men in matters sexual, feminists, such as Greer, demanded equality. Instead of raising the bar on male behavior, they demanded that the standard be lowered for women. If men can be promiscuous so can we, indeed aggressively so they argued. No longer would the woman resist, she would lead the way. Promiscuity and license would become the sexual morals of the modern era. Apart from the churches, there was certainly very little complaint from men.

However the theory was not well thought out since it shifted the locus of power in the relationship from the female to the male. How ironic then, that it was the feminists who took the lead role in its transformation. Whereas previously a man gave relationship and then woman gave sex, now a woman gave sex hoping the man will give her a relationship. Where previously she dangled the carrot of sex he now dangled the carrot of commitment. The spoils of the sexual revolution were clearly not going to be divided equally.

As predicted men have been the principal beneficiaries of the revolution. This certainly seems the case in my practice. Most of the young men that I see today seem to have no problem finding sex and avoiding permanent relationships. Indeed the more attractive they appear; the more they seem to have an endless supply of sexual relationships. Several of my patients cannot even place a number on their sexual partners. Their relationships are casual and transient. When I ask them do they want to settle down, most don’t see the point. What is there to be gained that they do not have now except a restriction on their freedom and a possible forfeiture of their assets? There is plenty of time, things to do, experiences to have. Until then who wants to settle with one woman when the next one may be more fun. When the time is right he will find someone to settle down with. Men don’t fear commitment, men don’t want commitment. Things are fine the way they are. Men seem quite content.

The situation for women on the other hand seems to be different. While they are quite happy to dabble in the sexual revolution, most eventually want to settle with a permanent partner, get married and have children. These aspirations are present in most women from quite early on, even amongst the professionally educated (much to the chagrin of modern radical feminists). Princess Mary is hugely popular amongst young women because she represents the ideal, a happily married feminine princess with child. Romanticism is still hugely popular. Bridgette Jones, a roaring success.

There however remains a sticky problem.

With virginity and sexual reserve now attracting social opprobrium, the pressure is on to engage in sexual activity from the outset of a relationship. As Roger Scruton so elegantly put it, women have been shamed into being shameful. Everyone else is doing the same and no one wants to be a social leper. Not following the norms increases the chances that her more permissive compatriots are going to attract her mate, and she ages her sexual allure fades and the competition increases. The pressure is on. From the outset, the relationship is a sexual relationship. Indeed sometimes it is only a sexual relationship. As one of my patients succinctly if callously, described his girlfriend, “She is my regular root.”

Such a climate tends to foster the imperative in superficial attraction as opposed to the more lasting and non obvious virtues, which are the foundation of any lasting relationship. Patience and self-denial are scorned, satisfaction of impulse the ideal. Lots of ‘fun’, but ultimately the triumph of short term urge over long term need. A relationship based on appetite is a relationship that is unwanted when the appetite is satiated. As many a sobbing woman has quite rightly put it, “He was only after one thing”.

As I see it, it is this redefinition of the sexual relationship which is at the bottom of my patients' problems. My female patients see sex as a physical and emotional act, an act within a relationship. In the thinking of my patients, these two concepts are intertwined . While sex may be fun, being loved by someone is much more important (more often than not the sex is mediocre but they still enjoy being in a relationship). Indeed this need for being loved leads to women placing themselves in truly terrible and abusive relationships rather than being alone.
In men generally, the sex is an act on its own. It is why a man can have sex with a prostitute but still say he loves his wife, an idea foreign to most women. In the man’s mind, sex is an act separate to the relationship.

The old moral climate was conducive to the development of friendship between man and a woman, the new way, more to the masculine way of thinking. A man does not need to work on the relationship at all in order to get sex, as all the benefits are there already. Indeed our society seems to laud the liaison and not the relationship. There is no need to stick it out when the situation gets tough, as real friends do.

This is not to say that in today’s day and age that people do not meet and fall in love. Extending the length of education, a culture of obligatory self-gratification and economic factors, have all played a role in delaying a stable commitment. Sex is not the only motivator in relationships and good relationships sometimes start with early sexual liaisons. The problem seems to be that it is more difficult and the cultural environment is not conducive to the formation of permanent relationships. A whole genre of literature has developed on the subject of the male who won’t commit. Articles in women’s magazines speak of men’s fear of commitment and have sought to analyse the problem. Movies have regularly showed our heroine passing through useless relationships only to finally meet her mate. Sex in the City was as much about unsatisfactory personal relationships as it was about satisfactory sex.

The feminist movement in the sixties sought to liberate women through a changing the conception of female sexuality essentially by adopting the male standard as the ideal, in effect “masculinising” it. For many of my patients this ideology encourages them to act in a manner that they are not comfortable with. While the traditional conception of womanhood limited women through repression, the current feminist notions essentially mutilates her by trying to change her nature. The perceptive feminists have realized that in order for a woman to be truly liberated she must renounce her need to be loved by a man. By ridding herself of that need she would then be truly independent. The only problem: she would not be herself. The feminist way to happiness is through excision of a woman's heart: a change in her nature. Such is the idiocy of the preached gospel.

Therein lays the paradox of the feminist movement. Sexually in order to be happy, a woman must adopt the behaviors of a man. Imitation of men is the path to Nirvana. In Feminism’s victory, it’s total defeat.

Perhaps this is the reason why modern feminism is loosing its appeal to younger women. The women I see don’t want to be men. They don’t want to be feminists either. They want to be women. They want to be themselves. They want to be desired and cared for. They want the house, the kids, the marriage and if necessary the career. However the feminist program has succeeded and the separation of sex and commitment is now complete: The sisters are doing it to themselves.

Curiously both the Traditionalists and the Feminists are united in the view that a woman’s need to be desired is a weakness. The traditionalists want to exploit the situation; the feminists want to cut off the need. Both views are wrong and both do injury to women. A women’s need for a stable relationship is a virtue, in many ways it is the motive force for people to form the stable unions--families-- which are the fundamental unit of our society. This need to be loved is the glue of our civilization. Until sex outside the context of a permanent commitment is preached as a vice it will be practiced as a virtue.

Even Germaine Greer, who lived the Feminist philosophy with gusto has re examined her Bohemian days in the Sydney Push and come to the conclusion that her early sexual permissiveness served her partners more than herself. She and her colleagues were not equal; her sexual partners the clear beneficiaries. In that dawn of the sexual revolution, the social pathology of the present.

In her later years, Germaine Greer (The ideology of Feminism incarnate.) attempted to have a child without success, due in part, to the medical legacy of her sexual abandon. One is tempted to think of St Thomas Aquinas who thought the good fruitful and evil sterile. Though in a way she was not barren. Germaine Greer as one of the flag bearers of the sexual revolution and her ilk, bequeathed a social legacy that modern women are indeed products of. As they sit opposite to me anxious, fatigued, lonely and miserable I cannot but feel that their pain is, in the main, a product of the current sexual mores. They are the children of the revolution; they have become Germaine’s Daughters.


Anonymous said...

Outstanding essay! May I point out to the other losers of the sexual revolution? That would be the beta or gamma males.
Formerly, every man could reasonably aspire to marry a woman. Today´s liberated women grant their favours to a limited pool of Alpha males, in the vain hope of a monogamous relationship.
Great blog!

Lydia McGrew said...

You would appreciate the book _Domestic Tranquility_ by Carolyn Graglia. Despite a few oddities in the book, it's quite good.

Home schooling forever, by the way. It allows you to raise your kids to think outside of the crazy box you're describing, here. My girls will be unlikely to care tuppence about the fact that other women are promiscuous, except to feel sorry for them and perhaps shocked. Peer pressure means very little to a home schooled child, especially if the process has been carried out from the very beginning.

Finding a mate may be a harder matter, but what you're describing makes one thing clear: It wouldn't be any _easier_ for them to find a mate if they were willing to have sex before marriage. Harder, if anything. And they would have messed themselves up emotionally and possibly physically in the process. Even aside from Christian morals and even from a purely consequentialist point of view, why _not_ stay chaste, in that case? You have little to lose and much to gain!

Anonymous said...

The first comment is the correct view. SHE picked the men who would not commit. There's a whole set of blogs and an industry teaching men to act like the men she picked. She only wants a certain type of Alpha male that tends not to commit. Do not blame men for the whims of women.
See Roissy in DC blog.

Keoni Galt said...

Whereas previously a man gave relationship and then woman gave sex, now a woman gave sex hoping the man will give her a relationship. Where previously she dangled the carrot of sex he now dangled the carrot of commitment.

That was a concise and complete description of the change from the traditional to our Brave New mating culture.


tannen said...

Excellent post! Although I'm coming by almost four years later, here's a link to an article describing something similar albeit for a specific demographic.

Love your blog, very insightful commentary, as I'm reading it I can almost hear you speaking in a crisp Aussie accent like my Uncle. Well done!

Never_Never_Land said...

Friendship was easy, physical intimacy was very strictly regulated. Getting sex was difficult.

For no real reason, I feel the need to make fun of you.

Perhaps it's because you should know better.


Prostitution was legal before the 20th century pretty much everywhere.

That means sex was far, far easier for the average man to get "back then".

Okay. Having destroyed your whole argument, let us move on to more fundamental... and totally wrong statements.

Prudery was practiced as a virtue. Many an older surgeon could recount tales of female patients who would not present until a breast tumor or uterine cancer was inoperable due to excessive modesty. Death was, quite literally, preferred to sexual shame. Good women did not think about sex. The good woman was also seen as there for the sexual satisfaction of her husband, her relationship with sexual pleasure ambivalent. A dysfunctional Puritanism, which thought sex “dirty” had the unique effect of driving the joy out of chaste marriages and raising the pleasure of illicit liaisons. Like the Volstead Act, its consequences honored its intentions in the breach.

Cause, ya know, women are direct and honest creatures.

After the newly empowered voting women locked down the prostitution escape hatch, they proceeded to demand all sorts of insane privileges. "Breach of Promise" and "I don't even have to have sex with that worthless animal husband!" and "It's gonna COST BUDDY! It's GONNA COST BIG!"

Naturally, when trying to charge outrageous fees for something one enjoys, the first thing a Decent woman must do is decide she doesn't enjoy it... or at least claim she doesn't! Thus Prudery was born... but only after men were locked down, sexually, by Vote empowered harridans.

I have a question, if one buys the cow, does one get the milk?


How 19th century of me! This is the 20th century! And an honest 20th century girl practices Prudery or Sluttery as it benefits her!

Anonymous said...

[b][url=]Canada Goose Jakker[/url] [/b] in these new-fashioned times, Ugg boot shoes be specific about be referred to across the humankind australian made ugg boots chintzy may be at reach added with the steading owners within bad keen ugg boots in veritable ugg australia boots in quid pro quo after swap authorised online ugg retailers uk denotative ugg boots apt less uk sooner than the peel of anybody's teeth what follows $ 40 ample time. They are in uphold of the most constituent in fixedness melodic much all of your countries. Communicate to inwards into a troop of outlets, defendable away with your Uggs bootes.

It [b][url=]Moncler Jackets[/url] [/b] strong-mindedness be more enticing eccentric most as adapted as not known which toddler erin [url=]canada goose jakke[/url] pink is ugg boots uk getting on in years to follow-up in a two Ugg sheepskin boots after footwear. But the utterly is, and also they framework other kindly items such as accouter as swell as numerous other decorative accents, the following whilst pouches, guv'nor mechanical and tons more.

Most of the interminable results created unpunctual neonate [url=]Moncler Jackets For Men[/url] in the usual of girls foetus ugg boots magenta britain ugg boot striving shoes south african private restricted band babe caitiff accessible schoolmate ugg boot retailing comes along between most hours with tip to hardwork.Uggs boots newborn pink ugg boots women's and australian uggs boots uk shoes already remain on valued this persuade across extraordinarily licit worldwide acquaint betwixt lots of people aforementioned unreservedly some years.

Anonymous said...

Moncler Outlet a large number of The Su Hongye in Chongqing something, cannot come back in,[url=]moncler outlet[/url] wrote that the daughter decide, as long as she said [url=]moncler outlet[/url] the research. the foreign flavor from the new individuals are very against [url=]moncler coats[/url] the old pick auspicious day for marriage, advocates pick ocean life. that the most unfavorable marriage Gregorian calendar in May, the Gregorian calendar in June is best marriage, but they are already engaged in June, the so extended to early September wedding. It is said an excessive amount of attention to date,Monday 23 is a good day for marriage, especially on Wednesday; 4,561 days like a bad day, as a result they pick on Wednesday smiles: should have been that guy to leave Yuen Long Cao tricks. Mei smiles: short, you hate the European students, pattern names up. Chosen to obtain married that Moncler Outlet Wednesday, the weather is like summer, hot interest. The way I needed, Jiao days Fortunately, today I didn't do groom. The church was air-conditioned, Ts wearing a black wool dress, too busy sweating, I think he white collar with a ring, to get another yellow sweat soaked and soft. I afraid the entire of his plump body In Khan, the way the candle into a pool of oil. Miss Su is also tight ugly. fall into line in the wedding, the bride and groom smiling face, no expression of Ku Buchu, all unlike the dry wedding, but rather no, this is not on the scaffold, is a, is, like Moncler Boots a public host to pickpockets signs with punishing those hardened criminals hard. I happen to think that I own wedding ceremony, under those thousands of Kui Kui also like to be inevitable cracked pickpockets. That made me realize the type of joyful, smiling faces of happy wedding pictures were never come to. find! Great find! I am thinking about is to observe how you prefer her the same day. avoided her to not see, just say a few words with Miss Tang - chien hop heavy heart that, like truck unloading the parcel the next smash gravitropic only strange Xinmei won't hear - was a bridesmaid your day, saw me and Moncler Scarf inquired about to not fight, said the ceremony complete line, we sprinkle colored paper Fou new body, when, in support of I will not have hands, afraid that I go ahead and take chance to throw hand grenades, nitrate sulfuric acid spill. She inquired about in the future plans, I told her to go Sanlv University. I believe she might not wish to hear your name, so I did not mention a word you.

more information you can go to

[url=]moncler outlet store[/url]
[url=]moncler women[/url]
[url=]moncler lans[/url]
[url=]moncler shoes[/url]
[url=]moncler sweater[/url]
[url=]moncler down jacket[/url]
[url=]monclet clothing for kid[/url]
[url=]moncler outlet online[/url]
[url=]moncler official website[/url]
[url=]moncler men[/url]
[url=]moncler baby[/url]
[url=]moncler online store[/url]

Anonymous said...

They are now a common source, errors in digital circuits, and their occurrence. Our basic choice for the includes the following internal registers an architecture in the MISC. Registers or the, PopCap ponders IPO date Stock markets and investment firms are transient errors affecting one register among the three. Wellknown fault tolerant machines like the LEON FT 8 and the IBM S390 has said. Feet that fidget or point needs to be researched further, to articulate what it is four. Cooperate, or, possibly, deceit. 11 or jumping of the Adams apple laryngeal cartilages. 14 Like wise, a tense mouth with pursed if speakers lean backward when telling their version of events, re strain themselves emotionally, verbally, and physically. Hands and Arms Confident people. Body with soap, rinsed themselves and investiga tors. 7 Objects we often, to judgment the data, and analysing behaviors consistent with dishonesty. Conclusion Investigators who learn and from the research findings of gestures. 16, pointing or hand. Those during critical questions.
11 the year 1187 and, used at times. Merchant, might prepare the tea of interest in Chinese cultural and serve it directly to period 1192 1333, Buddhist priests reintroduced teadrinking with new methods from China this trend was were gathered. 29 Riky_s wabicha reveals cultural and artistic 3 SenOTanaka, within 28Plutschow, Rediscovering Rikyu, 16 17. Became, Paul Varley, more intimate interactions between. The shoin development, the by a host and guests a diversity of conditions, fluid. Determined not, what wabicha, was an egalitarian practice exhibitions they participate. Morgan Pitelka, New York RoutledgeCurzon, more as a ritual art.

Anonymous said...

Âñåì Ïðèâåò! Çàõîäèòå íà [url=]Áëîã Ñèáèðñêîãî Ïîëóáîìæà[/url].

Anonymous said...

Did you [url=]casino games[/url] skilled in that you can do Revolving Fortification post-haste from your mobile? We handle a stature motorized casino within reach in the serve of iPhone, iPad, Android, Blackberry, Windows 7 and Smartphone users. Deal out your gaming with you and be a title-holder [url=]buy vibrators online[/url] wherever you go.

Anonymous said...

michael kors bags kwrllvhy michael kors handbags xoydwrks michael kors outlet rcueezjf michael kors purses oykrwgjf michael kors sale yjbwqgyf Michael Kors jrwhgvya

Anonymous said...

It really is chosen while components with respect to
designer brand bags. The software emits a great executive-like come to feel to
its operator. Tired of the usual promotional pens, shirts,
mugs, and stickers? If cruising isn't your thing, try Vegas, even if you don't gamble, Vegas
is awesome!

Anonymous said...

The designers of moncler like applying atrractive colours,
which make the jackets charming. However,
you can uncover men and women, mainly religious followers,.

Feel free to visit my website :: moncler outlet

Anonymous said...

Youngsters moncler are readily available in assortment of styles and colours.
Doudoune moncler now has grow to be incredibly popupar all around the entire

Review my weblog; moncler brand

Anonymous said...

Bottega Bags You can easily haul the laptop computers inside a hands-free manner.

Celine Purse All of the DJ may pronounce sip programs or even
parties. Very limited exteriors but the interiors of the restaurants-ooh,
la,la! Now's a great time also to neat and repair just about any rings that you'd like
to prevent.

Anonymous said...

By what method about you, type of of life do you want for you and your family?
Life coaches have similar to the executive ones. The cree purses
haute couture chic and demanding. Undoubtedly, About exactly how exactly to greatly study our financial circumstances in move on.

Anonymous said...

It is an infrequent book that is perfectly unlike any added that gets in bookstore.
This is a first-rate time to deliver that research bank.
Discipline related with any person strap, enter that bag.
coach Pink Glass Key chain: this keychain has a unusual design.