tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post8308286645144893999..comments2024-03-29T20:21:24.821+11:00Comments on The Social Pathologist: Pope Francis Appeals to Roissy. (Sort of)The Social Pathologisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12927698533626086780noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-3775969117053393992015-06-08T20:35:40.940+10:002015-06-08T20:35:40.940+10:00really cool your sharingobat ejakulasi dinireally cool your sharing<a href="http://tipspriaperkasaa.blogspot.com/2014/09/ramuan-obat-kuat-tradisional-ejakulasi.html" rel="nofollow">obat ejakulasi dini</a><br />ejakulasi dinihttp://tipspriaperkasaa.blogspot.com/2014/09/ramuan-obat-kuat-tradisional-ejakulasi.htmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-40685736005773844442015-05-21T22:42:24.786+10:002015-05-21T22:42:24.786+10:00This information is very helpful thank me :D :D
v...This information is very helpful thank me :D :D<br /><br />visit back my website ^_^<br /><a href="http://birojasastnk-perizinan.com/biro-jasa/" rel="nofollow">biro jasa sim</a><br /><a href="http://birojasastnk-perizinan.com/biro-jasa/" rel="nofollow">biro jasa bpkb</a><br /><a href="http://birojasastnk-perizinan.com/biro-jasa/" rel="nofollow">biro jasa perizinan</a><br /><a href="http://birojasastnk-perizinan.com/biro-jasa/" rel="nofollow">biro jasa stnk</a>Linahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13577888913701459250noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-50538634207106154842015-05-03T23:26:10.766+10:002015-05-03T23:26:10.766+10:00@Greg
Do you think the Marxism/Critical Theory cr...@Greg<br /><br /><i>Do you think the Marxism/Critical Theory creeping into the RCC went into overdrive with that?</i><br /><br />Context Greg, context.<br /><br />When the Pope uses the term feminist he's not using it in same the way the mainstream media is. Papal feminism is more an advocacy for women within the Catholic Church and not at the expense of men. JP11 was not pro-Choice.The Social Pathologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12927698533626086780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-68030601460703761442015-05-02T13:51:28.574+10:002015-05-02T13:51:28.574+10:00What do you think of JPII's comment: "I a...What do you think of JPII's comment: "I am the feminist pope."?<br /><br />Do you think the Marxism/Critical Theory creeping into the RCC went into overdrive with that?Gregnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-74494993127238379862015-04-19T00:37:05.328+10:002015-04-19T00:37:05.328+10:00I fail to see what the difference is between how a...I fail to see what the difference is between how a woman's cycle operates in the middle age's versus now. What has changed is we have a better idea about how it operates due to modern science. That's amoral. The lesson of morality is how people use this knowledge.<br /><br />Besides the reason why the church is around making proclamations is that it goes with new revelations in relative time. Just because we know more about things doesn't change how God designed it. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16190484330802907362noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-40290161929346792862015-04-19T00:21:45.259+10:002015-04-19T00:21:45.259+10:00@Earl
I don't really want to turn this into a...@Earl<br /><br />I don't really want to turn this into a discussion with regard to HV.<br />Though, you may be interested in this previous post of mine.<br /><br />http://socialpathology.blogspot.com.au/2013_10_09_archive.htmlThe Social Pathologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12927698533626086780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-48588232275187505582015-04-18T08:15:07.438+10:002015-04-18T08:15:07.438+10:00So you agree in principle with the document but ar...So you agree in principle with the document but argue the church doesn't understand coitus? I think when you start bringing the will of God into the picture it makes more sense. <br /><br />One can argue that a woman's cycle when it's not interfered with from hormonal contraception really gives God complete control over her womb when a sexual act is made. There are times a woman is a fertile as can be and it doesn't happen. And in her infertile periods we know of...God can still make it happen (plenty of biblical examples of barren women having kids). Even when a woman is on hormonal contraception she can still conceive. Point being is that God controls the womb when it comes to a sexual act. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16190484330802907362noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-11585549312365229862015-04-18T07:18:40.740+10:002015-04-18T07:18:40.740+10:00@ Earl,
As I see it, the prohibition of contracep...@ Earl,<br /><br />As I see it, the prohibition of contraception was not intrinsically wrong rather it is the understanding of the nature of coitus itself that is the issue.<br /><br />You might find this old post of mine interesting.<br /><br />http://socialpathology.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/the-teleology-of-coitus.htmlThe Social Pathologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12927698533626086780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-68500896963405253852015-04-18T06:54:18.086+10:002015-04-18T06:54:18.086+10:00'Perhaps the baleful effects were as a result ...'Perhaps the baleful effects were as a result of the document being flawed in some way.'<br /><br />What was the flaw about it? Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16190484330802907362noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-51175673131111644292015-04-17T23:19:40.689+10:002015-04-17T23:19:40.689+10:00@ Earl
I'm on the record as stating that Huma...@ Earl<br /><br />I'm on the record as stating that Humanae Vitae was not a good document. The rot really kicked in after the document was issued. My older colleagues told me of how it split the Catholic medical profession.<br /><br />The standard explanation for the baleful effects with affected the Church after its promulgation is that the People were weak in faith and turned their backs on the Pope, but I think that perhaps another possibility should be countenanced. Perhaps the baleful effects were as a result of the document being flawed in some way.<br /><br />I don't think that Paul V1 will be remembered as a good Pope.One man's heroic defiance is another's obstinancy.<br /><br />JPII is a different matter, especially in his earlier days. He shored up the Church, and made it a force to be reckoned with again. I reckon his greatest legacy will be Veritatis Splendor. Though it's interesting that he too wanted to develop a theology of the body. But his personalistic approach doesn't cut the mustard in my opinion, you gotta bring back Aquinas. (Theological shock and awe)<br /><br />Benedict was great in his own way but he was a theologian, not an action man. He was reactionary insofar that he pushed for the Truth. <br /><br />Francis, I reckon is the real deal. The other two fought the idiot left, Francis will fight the idiot right.<br /><br />@Dave<br /><br /> A bit of south American machismo would not go astray.<br /><br />The Social Pathologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12927698533626086780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-89532946940143365452015-04-17T22:31:29.982+10:002015-04-17T22:31:29.982+10:00Also Pope Francis is probably continuing a line of...Also Pope Francis is probably continuing a line of reactionary popes.<br /><br />The first reactionary pope IMO was Pope Paul VI with his Humanae Vitae...and how basically every prediction he made about what hormonal birth control would do to men and women has come true.<br /><br />Pope John Paul II had Theology of the Body. <br /><br />I'd have to do some digging to see if Benedict XVI addressed this but there does seem to be a theme among popes since the sexual revolution of reminding everyone about how men and women operate. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16190484330802907362noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-74749162037310015612015-04-17T22:29:22.903+10:002015-04-17T22:29:22.903+10:00The Platonist or Gnostic approach is weak. But Fra...The Platonist or Gnostic approach is weak. But Francis is less feminist than JPII, who never saw women in power, unlike Francis.<br /><br />A reference to scriptural headship would shore up Francis' position but he is trying to make nice.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-18298135158196377292015-04-17T22:25:05.577+10:002015-04-17T22:25:05.577+10:00I think both Pope Francis and the poster make good...I think both Pope Francis and the poster make good points...from what I read in his entire talk he does address this statement: <br /><br />'men to act like men and women to act like women and then do the talking'<br /><br /><br />'With gender theory, which argues that male and female characteristics are largely malleable social constructs, he said, "we risk going backward."<br /><br />http://ncronline.org/blogs/francis-chronicles/pope-francis-gender-theory-problem-not-solutionAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16190484330802907362noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-64906930478011111752015-04-17T21:14:14.241+10:002015-04-17T21:14:14.241+10:00@ Julian.
I thought the comment interesting for t...@ Julian.<br /><br />I thought the comment interesting for the simple fact that he called on intellectuals to shore up the "complementarian" position. I would have thought that the Church would have had this issue stitched up. <br /><br />There's a whiff of change in the air.The Social Pathologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12927698533626086780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-61159992426567637152015-04-17T12:16:56.774+10:002015-04-17T12:16:56.774+10:00When the pope refers to "knowing each other&q...When the pope refers to "knowing each other" better, this could of course include husband's knowing what really turns wives on. "complementarity" is not a bad start.Julian O'Deahttp://davidcollard.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-80690742169020314212015-04-17T12:00:00.475+10:002015-04-17T12:00:00.475+10:00It is not a statement that will do a huge amount f...It is not a statement that will do a huge amount for a positive view of traditional marital relationships, perhaps, but it is a step in the right direction.<br /><br />Underneath all the fluffy stuff, he is restating the complementarity line. I think one could spin this statement in a way that is positive for social conservatives.Julian O'Deahttp://davidcollard.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.com