tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post3951733351689438952..comments2024-03-29T20:21:24.821+11:00Comments on The Social Pathologist: Comments on Dampier's Posts.The Social Pathologisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12927698533626086780noreply@blogger.comBlogger50125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-79261925505286354612015-11-05T20:31:42.424+11:002015-11-05T20:31:42.424+11:00Sorry for the late reply Sebastian but I've be...Sorry for the late reply Sebastian but I've been away.<br /><br />I'm suprised to hear that Nationalism is supposed to be an evil? I suspect that it's dependant on how you define Nationalism. If, by Nationalism, you mean love of your own country, I can't see anything wrong with it nor can I see a problem with it in Catholicism. On the other hand, if by Nationalism you mean hatred of other Nations well then, yeah, there is a problem with it and Catholicism.<br /><br />I must admit, I'm a Nationalist, but it doesn't mean I hate other people. This does not mean I'm all kumbaya like. I oppose illegal immigration on nationalist grounds. Since I do believe that certain groups of immigrants would destroy the fundamental nature of the nation with the import of their culture. Each country is a sort of lifeboat and that means that we've got to make sure it doesn't sink.<br /><br />@Greg<br />The idiotic Left has been the best thing for the popular Right. The more they push against human nature the more it rebels against them.<br /><br />@Mark <br />Race is more phenoptyic than it is genetic. One of the funniest things in history is the fact that Nazi's paraded several individuals as prototypic Aryans only to find out later that they were mischlings.<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werner_Goldberg<br /><br />Theologically, all men are brothers in Christ, yet biologically i.e, our human nature, predisposes us to individuals of our own kind. Therefore I'm a big advocate for organising society along lines of "low cognitive entropy" , along human nature lines.The Social Pathologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12927698533626086780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-16855929277604610682015-11-03T16:39:18.451+11:002015-11-03T16:39:18.451+11:00In your opinion, is nationalism inherently evil? P...In your opinion, is nationalism inherently evil? People I know say that Catholics can't support it (because it is evil) - what are your thoughts on that? Thanks.Sebastiannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-25475181408376449592015-11-01T15:23:38.331+11:002015-11-01T15:23:38.331+11:00Seems like the main concern of the Left in Germany...Seems like the main concern of the Left in Germany is that the Far-Right doesn't gain anymore power: https://archive.is/GiJOXGregnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-21948946994168642002015-10-31T11:34:45.273+11:002015-10-31T11:34:45.273+11:00I have a problem with the transient nature of this...I have a problem with the transient nature of this word 'white' which seems to mean different things to different people. I was just listening to a white nationalist who declared that Poles are white, but Russians are not... How is that even possible when both are Slavs!<br /><br />Race is so much more dynamic than mere biology. It is fundamentally a spiritual reality, as Evola said. It is often far more appropriate to talk about ethnicities in specific rather than in broad strokes, but I use 'Occident' to denote those people whose spiritual roots lie in the European continent reaching as far east as the Ural mountains, at which point we enter the 'orient'. These people have something in common, and that is that they were spiritually cleaved to the blood pact of Christendom, Orthodox or Catholic.<br /><br />This is what I fight for. The only thing which makes 'whites' as a broad group of interest to me, outside of my own particular ethnicity, is our common ancient heritage in Christianity, which is likely related to a Hyperborean origin in our own case. I would gladly be party to the execution of white enemies of this spiritual destiny. Their flesh color grants them no privilege to stamp on the bones of our ancestors nor the future of Occidental Christian unborn children, be they Slavic, Magyar, Latin, or Germanic.I have zero tolerance for Liberals, so the so-called 'nationalists' special pleading for Swedish leftists should take heed. It would be worth the loss of 9/10ths of godless tolerance-loving Swedes to even preserve one Swedish Christian village. Africans don't factor into the equation. They can be deported without issue, so why is this even a debate? The question is not what should be done with non-Occidentals in the Occident, regardless of their religion. Everyone knows the answer to this. The question is what is to be done with the apostates, the traitors, the scoundrels?<br /><br />Treason of all orders follows only from a treason of the spirit. To think in purely scientific and materialist terms is to commit a grave error of judgment.<br /><br />Those who genuinely care about race, and I know 90% of the commenters here do, must think smart rather than bloviate. You must realize there is NO FUTURE for a secular or democratic ethnocentrism. It was attempted in the last century and failed. We will indeed enter a period of chaos, and it will make Wiemar look tame by comparison. What will emerge will be aristocratic, monarchical, and theonomic, thus organically 'kinist' as our ancestors were. Russia is already exemplifying a trend in this direction. It will not be a populist shitfest with a pogrom in the paki district.<br /><br />I have a vision of the future where perhaps in... let's say Poland, fair-skinned Polish children look out from a rich field at harvest time to the distant edges of their family's farmland, to the little Polish town where the only non-Poles are a few traveling merchants from Hungary and Germany. There, hanging from disused telephone lines are the corpses of Poles who betrayed their nation and their religion. And as people pass, they make the sign of the cross and thank the merciful God that He did not put the Polish nation to the flame as He would no doubt have done to other nations who boasted in their 'Enlightenment' to the bitter end and thus pledged their allegiance to satanism.<br /><br />I want to know why anyone who claims to care about the 'white race' is opposed to those of us who simply want Europe to look structurally similar to how it was prior to the dawn of mercantalism? That is with kings in power, priesthoods and lords governing locally, women in the home, and foreigners far away across oceans and out of mind.This is Reaction. This was De Maistre's last will and testament. Clear Watershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01067495451323861530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-65177563132356018612015-10-28T15:50:12.875+11:002015-10-28T15:50:12.875+11:00I wonder how these kids are going to process this:...I wonder how these kids are going to process this: http://cdrsalamander.blogspot.ca/2015/10/diversity-thursday_22.html<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-68323680375909152682015-10-25T19:12:56.804+11:002015-10-25T19:12:56.804+11:00On another note: I appreciate your book reviews, S...On another note: I appreciate your book reviews, SP/Slumlord, and I do occasionally buy those books. Anyhow, would it be possible for you to make a "suggested reading" list? I see such lists throughout the Orthosphere, Manosphere, alt-right blogs, HBD blogs, etc, and would appreciate one from you. Thanks.Gregnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-10861732309075513982015-10-25T13:38:09.015+11:002015-10-25T13:38:09.015+11:00"The whole idea of "America" was th..."The whole idea of "America" was that as long as you accepted American values you could be American, regardless of your race."<br /><br />There are many people who come to the US who do not accept even some of those values (I refer, in part, to the American constitution).<br /><br /><br />"What exactly are Anglo-American values?"<br /><br />Well, we can start with the legal system, belief in social hierarchy, individualism, free speech, and private property. I would repeat the gun rights one as an American value, since it is generally unique in the world (America having written its constitution to be deliberately anti-tyrannical).<br /><br /><br />"I think you'll find a fair amount of disagreement among White Americans as to what they constitute."<br /><br />Yes, there's a fair amount of disagreement nowadays. I think an argument could be made that certain values have fallen to the wayside as a result of a cycle between demographic shifts and voting patterns (e.g. Democrats sign 1965 immigration bill -> lots of Mexicans arrive -> those vote for Democrats -> Democrats enact legislation that shifts the Overton window -> culture further changed (i.e. law guiding morality)).<br /><br /><br />"Any WN movement, by definition, has to make reference to skin colour."<br /><br />Arguing for free speech and gun rights would alone filter out 90%+ of people whom WN/WS movements would not "like." Most immigrants to the US (for example) do not support gun rights or even free speech. What I am saying is that if a WN/WS movement wanted to go under the radar, they would be best to simply argue for things that could certainly be considered (at the very least) American values, knowing that the people they don't like (be they "race traitors" or non-whites) almost entirely do not support those values. Basically, using a set of values as a proxy for other criteria (e.g. skin color). I bring it up only because I'm surprised they haven't tried it.<br /><br /><br />"Have any of you even been here in Australia. The PC is strong here."<br /><br />"An anonymous person in Australia has no real need to fear." - The context of the preceding sentence was the response to Anon's suggestion that you ("traitors and their pawns"?) would be attacked for not vocally(?) supporting WN/WS, nationalist, and/or anti-immigrant movements. At least, that was my reading of it.Gregnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-91025316546530590422015-10-24T17:47:21.136+11:002015-10-24T17:47:21.136+11:00You really do sound like a former commentator here...<i>You really do sound like a former commentator here, Hollenhund. Understand that I don't blog for a living and have other commitments. I get back to the comments when I can.</i><br /><br />Can't say that name rings a bell. But I was commenting on your lack of response to my comment while simultaneously responding to others.<br /><br /><i>No, there are other options.</i><br /><br />Either get rid of the refugees or watch white society cease to exist. Reality is not kind to those who dawdle.<br /><br />And people won't. As a certain treasonous German mayor and some foreign invaders in Sweden found out this week, we are not so beaten as the propaganda portrays. Our time is coming, and the longer cucks and leftists try to delay it the more unpleasant it will be.<br /><br />If you're going to pray, I suggest asking God for the process to come as swiftly as possible. That would certainly save lives, long term.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-23315517997401761962015-10-24T07:31:41.564+11:002015-10-24T07:31:41.564+11:00@Greg
I have to admit I'm always extremely su...@Greg<br /><br /><i>I have to admit I'm always extremely surprised that the white nationalist/white supremacist/etc side has not simply espoused Anglo-American values </i><br /><br />Well that really isn't a "white" position at all. The whole idea of "America" was that as long as you accepted American values you could be American, regardless of your race. Any WN movement, by definition, has to make reference to skin colour. The other big problem is, What exactly are Anglo-American values? I think you'll find a fair amount of disagreement among White Americans as to what they constitute.<br /><br />@tonsplace<br /><br /><i>you are a moral coward afraid to take the hard stand and afraid of White men like me</i><br /><br />A hard heart is of no value if it is controlled by a soft head. The White Nationalist movement has always been a magnet to thugs but its interesting to note that they have been even <i>less effective</i> than the people of the moral highground. I mean the Klan, when it wasn't putting the hurt on blacks, was pushing Prohibition. I mean how dumb was that? The only thing I fear from "hard men" like yourself is self destruction of any nascent renewal by their entryism.<br /><br />I've followed some of your comments Ton and I don't think even you realise how much of a product of modernity you are. The contempt which the modern prole holds toward education, refinement and culture is really a type of institutionalised barbarism which the peasant classes of Europe never had. Sure, they may have despaired of their poverty and hated their masters but they never thought culture a bad thing. The Russian Commies, children of the Russian peasant class, always thought prole culture as something "declasse" and tried to educate their citizens in more civilised values. Hitting the books is just as important as hitting the gym.<br /><br /><br />@Anon.<br /><br /><i>So, SP, you can't even find it in you to reply to me after I extended that courtesy to you. Very well then.</i><br /><br />You really do sound like a former commentator here, Hollenhund. Understand that I don't blog for a living and have other commitments. I get back to the comments when I can.<br /><br /><i>It is open borders multiculturalists vs. we evil white racists</i><br /><br />No, there are other options.<br /><br />@Greg<br /><br /><i>An anonymous person in Australia has no real need to fear. </i><br /><br />Have any of you even been here in Australia. The PC is strong here.The Social Pathologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12927698533626086780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-67940148835296798652015-10-23T18:48:52.406+11:002015-10-23T18:48:52.406+11:00"I'll leave you with this thought: our ti..."I'll leave you with this thought: our time is coming. People are afraid, and people are angry. The traitors and their pawns have already begun to pay, and there will be far more before it is all over. You would do well to consider whose side you are on."<br /><br />I sincerely doubt it. Only those who are publicly in support of the current mess in Europe are even going to risk reprisal. Sure, there's the occasional stabbing, bombing (attempt), or arson attack, but that's towards people who are (stridently) in favor of bringing in huge numbers of migrants/refugees/immigrants/invaders. And frankly, very few overall.<br /><br />An anonymous person in Australia has no real need to fear. Some far-left politician in Europe? Yeah, I wouldn't want to be them (but they will, 99.9%, survive unscathed).<br /><br />I think at some point the support for the migrants will break down, though - e.g.: female open borders advocates can only be raped so many times by migrants before they (and the males who orbit them) change their minds and go home.Gregnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-87522926367465034812015-10-23T08:37:21.888+11:002015-10-23T08:37:21.888+11:00So, SP, you can't even find it in you to reply...So, SP, you can't even find it in you to reply to me after I extended that courtesy to you. Very well then.<br /><br />I'll leave you with this thought: our time is coming. People are afraid, and people are angry. The traitors and their pawns have already begun to pay, and there will be far more before it is all over. You would do well to consider whose side you are on.<br /><br />And, before you inevitably say it, "God's side" is not a meaningful statement in this context. Both sides claim support from God. It is open borders multiculturalists vs. we evil white racists. Pick your team, or be crushed by both.<br /><br />"You may no be interested in war, but war is interested in you."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-44918403527713388632015-10-23T05:58:44.448+11:002015-10-23T05:58:44.448+11:00You are nm other morally superior; you are a moral...You are nm other morally superior; you are a moral coward afraid to take the hard stand and afraid of White men like me<br /><br />For generations now dumbasses have tried to take the moral high ground when combating the left and they have failed at every turn because they are to ignorant to understand the moral high ground is where ever you place your artillery <br /><br />Also immigration is always bad for native born citizens and culture always bad always bad, which is why the second version of the Klan was so mm popular up nortbAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-34960283181453953692015-10-22T01:26:25.334+11:002015-10-22T01:26:25.334+11:00To him who knows the good he ought to do and does ...To him who knows the good he ought to do and does not do it, for him it is sin, James 4:17. Clearly, differing rates of behavior indicates different knowledge of good between groups, no? Different groups produce different moralities.<br /><br />Different population clusters aren't morally inferior/superior, just morally different. The problem comes from expecting similar behavior from all groups.<br /><br />The problem with solely focusing on spiritual degeneracy is that one can always remove themselves from this worldliness by focusing on one's own walk with God. If that's the route one advocates then there's simply no reason to concern oneself with secular politics at all - all politics is inherently secular, as it concerns the here and now. There is a good case to be made that followers of Jesus should avoid politics altogether, one I dispute.<br /><br />Anyways, the "bad" white people are simply the imperial ruling class and their attendants/retainers who are simply doing what all imperial ruling classes in history have done. A better approach to current politics isn't to go the racial nationalist route but to advocate anti-imperialism.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09260398531366109345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-13568194080292294872015-10-21T17:20:09.123+11:002015-10-21T17:20:09.123+11:00"I'm always extremely surprised that the ..."I'm always extremely surprised that the white nationalist/white supremacist/etc side has not simply espoused Anglo-American values"<br /><br />They don't have any more confidence in their capacity to enunciate them persuasively than anyone else does.Desideriushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12068424457665874295noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-23597904371332419082015-10-21T15:58:51.025+11:002015-10-21T15:58:51.025+11:00By the way, what are your thoughts on the Canadian...By the way, what are your thoughts on the Canadian federal election, and the announcement of 250,000 refugees (or "refugees", as the case may be) being taken in over the next few years?Gregnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-30941816212740370222015-10-21T15:55:18.460+11:002015-10-21T15:55:18.460+11:00"Supremacists tend to see social pathology as..."Supremacists tend to see social pathology as a problem of racial contamination."<br /><br />To add to my previous comment, I have to admit I'm always extremely surprised that the white nationalist/white supremacist/etc side has not simply espoused Anglo-American values (or something like it) without apology, instead of focusing on skin color (which in my experience seems to be a less successful selector than the former, given the WS/WN goals).Gregnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-19420721264542739692015-10-21T15:46:53.396+11:002015-10-21T15:46:53.396+11:00"If White= Good and Black= Bad, how to explai..."If White= Good and Black= Bad, how to explain the above?"<br /><br />Perhaps like "degrees of infinity"? Or how about: "white" AND {set of other traits}?<br /><br />I mean, I always assumed that anyone who considered themselves a "white nationalist" (or "black nationalist", etc), had accompanying (unique-ish) views - e.g. WN and Anglo-American views on liberty (I guess that's possible(?)).Gregnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-45639999099178466922015-10-21T11:20:21.253+11:002015-10-21T11:20:21.253+11:00@ Chris
It is called being a free-rider. All biol...@ Chris<br /><br /><i>It is called being a free-rider. All biological systems have them</i><br /><br />What percentage of whites are free riders? Empirical data please.<br /><br /><br />@Rhetocractes<br /><br /><i>I've thought for a while that White Nationalism is just another way to be a Progressive></i><br /><br />@Asher<br /><br /><i>I am quit disappointed that you are not offering a demarcating criterion between actions that are freely chosen and those that are determined.</i><br /><br />I've been busy but I also want to keep the comments section on topic.<br /><br />Disagree, I don't progressive as much as it is a public voice to an increasing sense of alienation wrought about because of multiculturalism. People are natural homophiles and prefer to be around people of their own kind. It's part of human nature. Multiculturalism, like the fat acceptance movement feels "wrong" to many people and its wrongness of it is proportional to how much it deviates from the natural human ideal. The rise of "racism" in Europe is directly as a result of the non European immigrant influx.<br /><br />White Nationalism is the mob voice expressing its displeasure, and like most mob actions the idea is formless and poorly thought out except for the underlying motivating factor which is the revulsion to multiculturalism.<br /><br />As for "whiteness" it's a legitimate taxonomic category. The problem comes with imputing moral virtue to melanin content.The Social Pathologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12927698533626086780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-3648780750137653982015-10-21T04:59:52.054+11:002015-10-21T04:59:52.054+11:00"If White= Good and Black= Bad, how to explai..."If White= Good and Black= Bad, how to explain the above? Some commentators whom I have sparred with have suggested that the liberal whites are "race traitors", but this generates another problem: How can you be a traitor to your genes if your genes determine if you're a traitor or not? If White is good then how come there are "bad" whites. It's a logical contradiction, though cognitive misers wouldn't notice."<br /><br /><br />It is called being a free-rider. All biological systems have them.<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_rider_problem<br /><br /><br />Itchrisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-17037714884966098492015-10-21T04:23:02.750+11:002015-10-21T04:23:02.750+11:00I've thought for a while that White Nationalis...I've thought for a while that White Nationalism is just another way to be a Progressive. I'll delineate why below:<br /><br />1) Reducing people to replacable ciphers: check<br />2) Believing in the progress of society and the attainment of a Heaven on Earth: check (usually)<br />3) Advocating an abstract political formula to the expense of all else: check<br />4) Virtue signalling to the expense of virtue attainment: check<br />5) Associative thinking rather than logical thinking: check (see: you disagree with me so you're a nasty prog bastard)<br /><br />Further, I have a few simple problems with the central conceit. Foremost, <b>there is no such thing as a White person or White people</b>. That itself is a progressive reductivist over-simplification for the purpose of reducing people to interchangeable ciphers; see point one. There are Englishmen, there are Scotch, there are Welsh, there are Provencal, there are Vaudois, there are Catalan, there are Aragonese, there are Umbrians, there are Firenzi, there are Prussians, there are Bavarians, there are Alsatians, etc. etc. and each of these peoples are genetically distinguishable. Furthermore, there used to be more/different groups, which have faded or failed with the passage of time, or are still partially distinguishable. Treating all these people as though they are the same is bound to lead to civil unrest, just like American immigration during the Carnegie era led to explosive riots and just like shoving various Sub-Saharan Africans together ends in bloodshed.<br /><br />In the final analysis, the White Nationalists are wrong about what people are. The better kind have gotten 'White' and 'can trace itself back to pre-Reformation Catholicism' mixed up. Yes, genetics inform culture rather heavily. But then, culture informs genetics rather heavily right back. To say one is the cause and one is the effect is wrong.<br /><br />That said, they have their uses. Foremost is that they're willing to explode some of the myths of our Progressive overlords and they don't mind looking unfashionable while doing it, like the myth that all people are created equal. And they make a really good shit-test for any left entryists who try to join Reaction, because if you can stomach outright vitriolic racism, well, you're automatically thrown out of the company of right-thinking people.Rhetocrateshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00896200921105061521noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-24611107565506470972015-10-20T23:09:19.305+11:002015-10-20T23:09:19.305+11:00@ SP
I am quit disappointed that you are not offe...@ SP<br /><br />I am quit disappointed that you are not offering a demarcating criterion between actions that are freely chosen and those that are determined.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09260398531366109345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-26579120048897630092015-10-20T08:36:15.646+11:002015-10-20T08:36:15.646+11:00I do understand where the white racialists are com...I do understand where the white racialists are coming from: every group is allowed to prefer their own, except whites. However there are a lot of RP black mwn. They are more natural allies to RP white men than simple skin color affinity would suggest. In fact the 'Sphere is by far the most <i>truly</i> diverse community that I have every come across: White, Black, American Indian, straight, gay, Christian, Pagan, what have you.Robert What?https://www.blogger.com/profile/03863449539859132763noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-25966559788634377462015-10-20T02:22:29.497+11:002015-10-20T02:22:29.497+11:00The truly righteous can probably interact with rea...The truly righteous can probably interact with really broken people / groups with relative (spiritual) safety, hence deployment of priests / missionaries / Jesus to high concentrations of such people to help them. Normal people with average-above average levels of discipline would be foolish to hang out around serious "sinners" and expect to avoid being corrupted. "A man's got to know his limitations."<br /><br />The medical analogy continues: we isolate the seriously mentally ill to keep them from spreading chaos, then we send the sanest, best trained people in to deal with them. What we don't do is invite them into our homes, this is not constructive.Robert Brockman IInoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-4150740541703109882015-10-19T12:59:46.814+11:002015-10-19T12:59:46.814+11:00D. Max, thanks for the quotes, but I am at a loss ...D. Max, thanks for the quotes, but I am at a loss to understand how those conflict with anything SP said. <br /><br />Does P-man know you're linking your name to MPC? Maybe you should have someone intelligent over there vet your posts before doing that.<br /><br />RB, I missed the part where Jesus recommended quarantining the righteous from the sinners to avoid contagion. <br /><br />Gabe Ruthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06958214257606957422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-36448606864037185742015-10-19T01:54:41.159+11:002015-10-19T01:54:41.159+11:00We have reached an impasse. You see, I'm fully...<i>We have reached an impasse. You see, I'm fully cognizant of black societal dysfunction which may or may not have a strong genetic cause, but as I'm a Jesus person I'm under orders from the boss who tells me that all lives matter. It's an article of faith.<br /><br />This is where the rubber hits the road. Under your schema there is no room for my faith, you are at war with my God.<br /><br />And everyone loses against Him in the end.</i><br /><br />No, I'm not. I'm at war with you, and anyone else assisting in destroying the future of my children for the sake of feelgoods. Your Christianity has nothing to do with it, except insofar as you perceive it as being a reason to oppose us evil nationalists.<br /><br />It may surprise you to learn to learn that among our number are some very devout orthodox believers, who haven't forgotten that once upon being Christian meant riding valiantly to Europe's defense against the Islamic invaders. The last thing I wish to do is demean their faith. It's the behavior of Christians that I have a problem with, not the faith itself.<br /><br />And even you are forced to admit the reality the blacks, as a group, are simply born far dysfunctional than whites. I wish to live in society without that dysfunction around. If and when that happens and sanity is restoring, then we can see about what might be possible to help other peoples. But fixing up the home front is job number one.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com