tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post3990396172054719983..comments2024-03-28T17:58:56.707+11:00Comments on The Social Pathologist: Carnal Lite II: The Virtues of Eros.The Social Pathologisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12927698533626086780noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-74513320290775676412015-06-24T21:20:55.856+10:002015-06-24T21:20:55.856+10:00This is subordination of that which is superior, t...This is subordination of that which is superior, the spiritual, to that which is inferior, the flesh which soon passes away."For what things a man shall sow,those also shall he reap. For he that soweth in his flesh of the flesh also shall reap corruption. But he that soweth in the spirit of the spirit shall reap life everlasting" Galatians 6:8." It is our duty as Catholics to resist the flesh, lest we fall away into the great multitude of infidels and apostates who live as filthy disgusting beasts, thinking of nothing but gratifying their basest inclinations without restraint. What is life but a preparation for death? We are here to save our souls by corresponding with God's grace, not to be the willing slaves of our flesh. <br /><br />One must admit that many Catholics today are unmanly, thoroughly imbued with a pacifistic spirit that is not at all Christian. But this is not because they are insufficiently "fleshly" for lack of a better way to put it, quite the opposite, they pamper their bodies and love them altogether too much to dare risk them by combatting the enemies of the Faith. That is why all these blasphemers, sodomites, communists and various other breeds of two-legged cockroach get away with so much. As far as failed marriages go, this has happened throughout history, it is a result of fallen human nature, not a failure on the part of men to spend all their time toadying to their wives trying to figure out how to keep them attracted. "As the climbing of a sandy way is to the feet of the aged, so is a wife full of tongue to a quiet man. Look not upon a woman's beauty, and desire not a woman for beauty. A woman's anger, and impudence, and confusion is great. A woman, if she have superiority, is contrary to her husband. " Ecclesiasticus 25:27-30.<br /><br />Those who marry can expect to suffer. The difference now is that those who run things have decided to do away with the family in order to better retain and strengthen their own power over those they consider to be their cattle, and so they deliberately made unjust laws that cater for women, enabling to them to gratify their every caprice, which of course brings about the ineluctable destruction of the family. One must admit it was a stroke of genius on their part as women are generally unable to foresee the consequences of their actions. They figure that if they just divorce this boring fellow who has dared to not provide the life of a Disney princess that all the films and television programmes have promised, then tomorrow she'll most certainly find the long awaited prince who will usher her forthwith into the joys of a terrestrial paradise. Of course if she thought it through she would realize the utter impossibility of such a thing, but she doesn't think, that would interfere with her over-wrought emotionalism. Anyhow it's all over. The west as it is usually termed has had its throat cut and is now in its last few spasms flopping about on the floor in a spreading pool of its own blood. The worst part of it is that the people were handed the open razor and voluntarily, enthusiastically cut their own throat. It was to use the old term, a case of self-murder. The decadent western "democracies" (really plutocratic oligarchies) will sooner or later be overrun and crushed by the more disciplined and vigorous people of the east. It must needs be so. "But if the salt lose its savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is good for nothing anymore but to be cast out, and to be trodden on by men." Gospel of St. Matthew 5:13. I pray that you will renounce this aberrant train of thought and do penance. May God have mercy on us all. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-62582101818616889612015-06-22T16:31:58.335+10:002015-06-22T16:31:58.335+10:00@Greg
How would you go about convincing churches ...@Greg<br /><br /><i>How would you go about convincing churches (RCC, etc) that their path towards total feminization (of attitude, of masculine concept, etc) is wrong and destructive?</i><br /><br />I think the first step is to reaffirm a theology of the body, in other words the goodness of the flesh. Sexuality, particularly, needs to be evaluated without a procreative bias, which is intrinsic to our <i>traditional</i> understanding of it. Rather, the legitimacy of the unitive factor needs to be recognised the factors facilitating it appreciated. Fleshy desire is a good thing but it needs to be regulated in light of Caritas. For too long we have approached the subject as if the two elements were opposed.The Social Pathologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12927698533626086780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29137904.post-70327960822332742342015-06-21T17:59:40.908+10:002015-06-21T17:59:40.908+10:00How would you go about convincing churches (RCC, e...How would you go about convincing churches (RCC, etc) that their path towards total feminization (of attitude, of masculine concept, etc) is wrong and destructive?<br /><br />How would you convince said churches that a more complete alliance with feminism is only going to lead to misery?Gregnoreply@blogger.com